{"id":366,"date":"2010-07-08T17:49:37","date_gmt":"2010-07-08T17:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/?p=366"},"modified":"2010-07-08T17:49:37","modified_gmt":"2010-07-08T17:49:37","slug":"the-non-profits-of-profits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/?p=366","title":{"rendered":"The Non Profits of Profits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In ignoring the spirit of the recent ban against earmarks, which excluded corporations, but allows non-profits to apply, Corporations have been establishing non-profit organizations at a fast clip.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>New York Times<\/em> notes &#8220;companies have shown remarkable ingenuity in skirting the rule or  veiling their requests through nonprofit organizations.&#8221;\u00a0 They reported by way of example on four such schemes that are all the more egregious given the number of educational and social services  organizations being starved out of existence by the lack of public  funding and having little earmark acumen and zero funds to grease the pump.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the examples provided in the <em><a title=\"New York Times\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/07\/05\/us\/politics\/05earmarks.html?_r=1&amp;scp=24&amp;sq=July%205,%202010&amp;st=cse\" target=\"_blank\">New York Times <\/a><\/em>article of July 5, 2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b6The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vrphobia.com\/\">Virtual Reality Medical Center,<\/a> a California-based company that sells visual simulation headgear as an  experimental form of medical therapy, had sought nearly $6 million in  earmarks before the ban. Soon after, company officials instead proposed  that the money go to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.interactivemediainstitute.com\/\">Interactive Media  Institute<\/a>, a nonprofit group controlled by the center\u2019s top  executives, which had been set up to sponsor educational conferences.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b6In Pennsylvania, <a title=\"More information about General Electric Co\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/business\/companies\/general_electric_company\/index.html?inline=nyt-org\">General  Electric<\/a> is likely to get as much as 80 percent of a $2 million  earmark proposed by <a title=\"More articles about Pennsylvania State University\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/reference\/timestopics\/organizations\/p\/pennsylvania_state_university\/index.html?inline=nyt-org\">Pennsylvania State University<\/a> for research on  clean-burning GE locomotives. At the suggestion of the company and the  university\u2019s lobbyist, according to a Penn State professor, the  university is listed as the lead player in the collaboration instead of  GE, as was done previously. GE executives made a series of political  contributions to Representative Kathy Dahlkemper, Democrat of  Pennsylvania, days after she submitted the earmark request.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b6In New York, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.copper.org\/\">Copper Development  Association<\/a>, a nonprofit group controlled by copper manufacturers,  is pursuing a $4.1 million earmark to hire suppliers to install its  members\u2019 copper products in New York City subway cars, asserting that  the metal has qualities that inhibit the spread of infectious diseases.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b6And a group called the <a href=\"http:\/\/thesolarec.org\/\">Solar Energy  Consortium<\/a> in Kingston, N.Y., is pursuing nearly $30 million in  earmarks, with the help of Representative <a title=\"More articles about Maurice D. Hinchey.\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/reference\/timestopics\/people\/h\/maurice_d_hinchey\/index.html?inline=nyt-per\">Maurice  D. Hinchey<\/a>, Democrat of New York. The group, working out of a tiny  office above a machine shop, does not perform its own research. Instead,  it plans to pass on most of the earmark money to local businesses, some  of which directly collected federal earmarks for solar projects this  year but would no longer qualify.<\/p>\n<p>All legal, but is it ethical?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Using non-profits to get around the ban on companies using earmarks. Not illegal, but unethical? You decide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[249,253,251,252,250],"class_list":["post-366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sustainability","tag-earmarks","tag-funding","tag-ge","tag-interactive-media-institute","tag-non-profits"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=366"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":370,"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366\/revisions\/370"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthsayers.tv\/sustainabilityadvocate\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}